Have you
ever been silenced? Were you given a
warning and an explanation? If you were anything like Elizabeth Warren, you
nevertheless persisted. On Tuesday, February 7th 2016, Elizabeth Warren took to the
Senate Floor to read a 1986 letter by Coretta Scott King (activist and wife of Martin Luther King Jr.) in opposition of Jeff
Sessions. She did not get far into the letter before
Senate Majority Leader Mitchell McConnell formally silenced her, stating a little known rule ( rule XIX ) that prohibited senators from insulting other
senators.
In case
you’re curious, the rule originated in 1902 after senators were throwing punches at each other. But hey,
reading a thought-provoking, relevant testimonial written by a civil rights
leader is basically the same thing right?!
She may have
been stopped from sharing the letter within the Senate Floor, but Senator Warren would
not be stopped from sharing it with an even larger audience---the public! When the Senate voted to silence her, Warren sat outside of the senate hearing and read the letter live on Facebook---capturing an
audience of over 6 million viewers.
If you have
been on Facebook within the past week, you likely have seen the hash tag
#ShePersisted and #LetLizSpeak, as the silencing of Senator Warren ignited a
feminist battle cry on social media. This is a great example of “when political candidates get their supporters riled up and
spreading the word, we call it “energizing the base” (Li & Bernoff, 2011,
55). Bernoff & Li (2011) explain that energizing the base is a powerful
way to use the groundswell to boost your business. Although it was McConnell who helped start this conversation in his
attempt to silence Warren, his actions have inspired tremendous support for Warren.
Trevor Noah interviewed Warren the next day (see above) and asked if McConnell knows how much he has helped her. Warren explained that, “It’s helped us have a better Democratic conversation. [...] We don’t have the votes in the United States Senate to block somebody like Jeff Sessions[as attorney general]. ... So what we’ve got to do is count on people all around this country to make their voices heard.”
Brodeur (2017) funnily describes, If ever a hashtag was handed down perfectly formed from the Internet gods themselves, #ShePersisted was it. To his point, the phrase has already lead to the
production of “she persisted” t-shirts which will help fund Elizabeth Warren’s
2018 re-election.
Similarly, Reebok released shirts following the McConnell silencing. And guess what? As of today they are already SOLD OUT. Rest assured though, they are making more to meet the high demand.
Inga Stenta, Reebok senior director of brand management expressed, "We are inspired and empowered by the senator's recent statements and these t-shirts are our way of showing our support for all women who continue to persist and break down barriers." What’s even better….Reebok is donating $20 from each shirt sold during the first 100 days of Trump's term to the to the Women's March campaign.
In a similar vein, Harvard book store created a she-persisted display. And as I am writing this post, more and more #ShePersisted swag (like the necklace below) is popping up in my newsfeed (Facebook clearly knows what I'm thinking about!)
Although Jeff Sessions was selected as U.S. Attorney General, revealing the limits to social media, the conversation that was launched and the monetary support pouring in to both Warren’s re-election campaign and the women’s march sheds light on the its power. Warren took the conversation to a much larger stage, empowering more citizens to voice their opinions. It is a reminder that we must all continue to persist towards the outcomes we want. Once again we see that when you try to silence the groundswell, it roars back exponentially louder.







Kristin,
ReplyDeleteWhat an excellent use of social media! I actually almost wrote about this myself because of how spot on social media was in creating widespread recognition of the event. Just thinking about this previous election, it is so clear to see how increasingly active social media has been in quickly spreading (angry gaining advocacy) for what is iccuringredients at the political level. Excellent use of videos and pictures to nail down your point.
Thanks so much for your comment, Rachel! It was amazing to see how widespread #shepersisted became and so quickly! Good point about the the prevalence of social media during the recent election and aftermath. Thanks for your feedback!
DeleteKristin, great post! I really enjoyed learning more about this. I have seen the hashtag, but had no idea it was so far spread that it has been turned into t-shirts. It is evident that Elizabeth Warren used the groundswell to her advantage. The fact that she left to record it live, she knew the groundswell would want to hear what the letter said, and she gave it to them. The fact that she was silenced probably made this letter even more widespread than it would have been if she had been allowed to finish reading it.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much, Nikki! Agreed--it was very smart of Elizabeth Warren to read her letter live, she seems to understand the groundswell. Good point that the act of silencing her inadvertently created a much larger audience than if McConnell had just allowed her to read it in the first place.
DeleteGreat post! I really enjoyed it. I actually came across an article on Facebook that described "The Streisand" effect through the backlash of silencing Warren. It was a good read, and was interesting to see it tie back to subject matter that was covered in our text. If I can find it, I'll forward it to you.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much, Meaghan! Great point about the similarity to the Streisand effect! Glad that Warren could teach McConnell a thing or two about the Streisand effect :)
Delete